THE EVALUATION OF ONE PUBLIC NURSING COLLEGE IN TERMS OF THE PROGRAMME CRITERIA OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY COMMITTEE

L Uys

Abstract


The purpose of the study was to do an evaluation of the KwaZulu-Natal College of Nursing against the seven input criteria of the Higher Education Quality Committee and make recommendations about improvements necessary in order for the College to become accredited with this body.
The evaluation was based on a survey of all teaching sites of the Nursing College, involving an architect and nurse educators. Questionnaires, interviews and site inspection check lists were developed and used to collect data. An initial data summary was done by the team leader, and this was first discussed with the evaluation team and then validated in a meeting with the College staff.
The results addressed each of the seven criteria and it was found that only one (assessment) was met, while three were partially met and three not met. It became evident that 70-80% of the KZN CN budget is spent on salaries of staff and students. The implication is that a minimal percentage could have been spent on teaching and learning.
South African Colleges of Nursing will never be able to adhere to the standards of higher education, except if the governance context changes to favour the autonomy of these colleges. The biggest challenge lies in adequate funding to ensure quality standards within the college teaching and learning environment, although system development and adequate facilities are also serious limitations.


Keywords


Higher Education Quality Committee; programme accreditation; nursing college; institutional evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


CHE (Council on Higher Education). 2004. Criteria for Programme Accreditation. Pretoria: CHE.

CHE (Council on Higher education). 2013. A Framework for Qualification Standards in Higher Education. Second Draft. Pretoria: CHE.

FUNDISA (Forum of University Nursing Deans in South Africa). 2011. News November 2011, Preparation of Nurse Specialists by Universities.

http://www.fundisaforum.org/archive.htm

Date of access: 8 April 2013.

FUNDISA (Forum of University Nursing Deans in South Africa). 2012. Report of the Feasibility Study of Kwa-Zulu Natal (KZN) Nursing College. (Unpublished report). Pretoria: FUNDISA.

Geyer, N. & Vasuthevan, S. 2008. The Formal Education and Training Environment (p78-95). In: Kotze, W. (ed.). 2008. Nurse Educators’ Guide to Management, Second ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

SANC (South African Nursing Council). 2013a. Details of New Nursing Qualifications.

Date of access: 30 April 2013.

SANC (South African Nursing Council). 2013b. New Qualifications: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).

Date of access: 30 April 2013.

RSA (Republic of South Africa). 2008a. Higher Education Amendment Act, No. 39 of 2008. Pretoria: Government Printer.

RSA (Republic of South Africa). 2008b. National Qualifications Framework Act, No. 67 of 2008. Pretoria: Government Printer.

Uys, L.R. & Gwele, N.S. 2005. Curriculum Development in Nursing. New York: Routledge.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14804/2-1-38

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Trends in Nursing


ISSN 2313-8467 (on-line)      Creative Commons License - CC BY 4.0


Powered by OJS and hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2014.


Disclaimer:

This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.

SUNJournals Help