SUPERVISION OF POST-GRADUATE STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Gisela Hildegard van Rensburg, Pat Mayers, Lizeth Roets

Abstract


Knowledge transfer is an inevitable process in higher education where research outputs are largely associated with the production of Masters’ and Doctoral graduates. The supervision of postgraduate students at universities is therefore one of the core responsibilities of academics and is considered a measure of academic output. Supervision not only transfers research and related skills, but is also an intensive and interconnected form of educator-student engagement. The role of the supervisor in providing a supportive, constructive and engaged supervision process is important in the development of next generation practitioners who have the correct educational and skills mix to fulfil the future needs of the profession. The underlying principle of student support during supervision is that an experienced supervisor will be able to move through the learning processes with the student as this becomes appropriate. As the student gains competence in the basic skills of conducting research in a particular field of study, he or she will move to a deeper understanding of the nature and reality of that field. Research and, ultimately, high quality supervision of students, plays a pivotal role in the scholarship of discovery and the development of evidence-based practice.

Keywords


student support, supervision, supervisor

Full Text:

PDF

References


Batane, T. 2010. Turning to Turnitin to Fight Plagiarism among University Students, Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2):1-15.

Bell, N.D. 2007. How native and non-native English speakers adapt to humor in intercultural interaction, International Journal of Humor Research, 20(1):27-48.

Betts, K. 2009. Lost in translation: importance of effective communication in online education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(2):1–13. University of West Georgia: Distance Education Centre. Available at: www.westga.edu~distance/ojdla/summer122/betts122.html (accessed on 8/04/2014).

Bitzer, E.M. 2011. Knowledge with wisdom in postgraduate studies and supervision: Epistemological and institutional concerns and challenges. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25(5):855-874.

Cleary, M., Hunt, G.E., & Jackson, D. 2011. Demystifying PhDs: A review of doctorate programs designed to fulfil the needs of the next generation of nursing professionals. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession, 39(2):273-280.

Clynes, M.P. & Raftery, S.E.C. 2008. Feedback: An essential element of student learning in clinical practice. Nurse Education in practice, 8:405-411.

Coetzer, D. 2013. Nagraadse verpleegstudente se verwagtinge rakende studieleiding. Thesis for Magister Societatis Scientiae (Nursing) degree. Universiteit van die Vrystaat.

De Beer, M., & Mason, R.B. 2009. Using a blended approach to facilitate postgraduate supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(2):213-226.

De Gruchy, J. W., & Holness, L. 2007. The Emerging Researcher. Nurturing passion, developing skills, producing output. Cape Town: Juta & Co.

Department of Education. 2001. National Plan for Higher Education. Pretoria: Department of Education, South Africa.

Drennan, J. 2008. Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire: reliability and factor structure with Master’s in Nursing graduates. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(4):487-498. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04619.x

Emilsson, U.M., & Johnsson, E. 2007. Supervision of supervisors: on developing supervision in postgraduate education. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 163-179. doi: 10.1080/07294360701310797.

Forneris, S.G., & Peden-McAlpine, C.J. 2006. Contextual learning: A reflective learning Intervention for nursing education, International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 3(1):article 17.

Gill, P., & Burnard, P. 2008. The student-supervisor relationship in the PhD/Doctoral process. British Journal of Nursing, 17(10):668-672.

Gunter, G. 2007. The Effects of the Impact of Instructional Immediacy on Cognition and Learning in Online Classes. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(3):196-202.

Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. 2010. Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1):79-92. doi: 10.1080/03075070902906798

Hamid, Y. & Mahmood, S. 2010. Understanding constructive feedback: a commitment between teachers and students for academic and professional development. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 60(3):224–227.

Hodza, F. 2007. Managing the student-supervisor relationship for successful postgraduate supervision: A sociological perspective. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(8):1155-1165.

James, R., & Baldwin, G. 1999. Eleven practices of effective postgraduate supervisors Retrieved from

http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/resources_teach/teaching_in_practice/docs/11practices.pdf

Kallos, J. 2014. Business e-mail etiquette. Large, red and bold: is this shouting too?

Available at: http://www.netmanners.com (accessed on 09/04/2014).

Ketefian, S., Davidson, P., Daly, J., Chang, E., & Srisuphan, W. 2005. Issues and challenges in international doctoral education in nursing. Nursing & Health Sciences, 7(3):150-156. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2005.00240.x

Kiani, A. & Jumani, N.B. 2010. Mentoring model for research in Higher Education in Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research, 2(5):414–430.

Kiley, M. 2011. Developments in research supervisor training: causes and responses. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5):585–599.

Lee, N.J. 2010. Making research supervision work for you. Nurse Researcher, 17(2), 44-51.

Lee, A. & Murray, R. 2013. Supervising writing: helping postgraduate students develop as researchers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.866329.

Lessing, A.C., & Schulze, S. 2003. Postgraduate supervision: students' and supervisors' perceptions. Acta Academica, 35(3):161-184.

Lessing, N., & Lessing, A. C. 2004. The supervision of research for dissertations and theses. Acta Commercii, 4:73-87.

Li, S., & Seale, C. 2007. Managing criticism in Ph.D. supervision: a qualitative case study. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4):511-526. doi: 10.1080/03075070701476225

Manathunga, C. (2007). Supervision as mentoring: the role of power and boundary crossing. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2):207-221.

doi: 10.1080/01580370701424650

McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. 2012. Postgraduate research supervision: a critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1):63-74.

doi: 10.1080/13562517.2011.590979.

McMichael, M.J., & McKee, M. 2008. Research supervision: An important site of teaching. Journal of teaching in Social Work, 28(1-2):53-70.

McNicholl, M.P., Coates, V. & Dunne, K. 2008, Driving towards an improved research and development culture, Journal of Nursing Management, 16(3):344–351.

Metcalfe, J., Thompson, Q., & Green, H. 2002. Improving standards in postgraduate research degree programmes.

Mouton, J. 2007. Post-graduate studies in South Africa: Myths, misconceptions and challenges. South African Journal of Higher Education: Postgraduate Supervision 2007: Special Edition 8(21):1078-1090.

Ngcongo, R. 2000. Self-esteem enhancement and capacity building in the process of supervising master's students. South African Journal of Higher Education, 14(1):211-217.

Paretti, M.C., McNair, L.D., & Holloway-Attaway, L. 2007, Teaching technical communication in an era of distributed work: a case study of collaboration between U.S and Swedish students, Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(3):1–13.

Petersen, E.B. 2007. Negotiating academicity: postgraduate research supervision as category boundary work. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 475-487. doi: 10.1080/03075070701476167.

Pillay, G., & Balfour, R.J. 2011. Post-graduate supervision practices in South African universities in the era of democracy and educational change 1994-2004. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25(2), 358-372.

Prensky, M. 2004, The emerging online life of the digital native: what they do differently because of technology, and how they do it, viewed 9 April 2014, www.marcprensky.com/.../Prensky- The_Emerging_Online_Life_of_the_Digital_Native-03.pdf

Severinsson, E. 2010. Discovering the value of research supervision. Nursing & Health Sciences, 12(4):400-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00565.x

Severinsson, E. 2012. Research supervision: supervisory style, research-related tasks, importance and quality - part 1. Journal of Nursing Management, 20(2):215-223. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01361.x

Singh, S. 2011. An intervention to assist students with writing their dissertations and theses. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25(5):1020-1030.

Strauss, P. 2012. ‘The English is not the same’: challenges in thesis writing for second language speakers of English. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(3):283-293.

doi: 10.1080/13562517.2011.611871.

Taylor, J. 2002. Changes in teaching and learning in the period to 2005: The case of postgraduate higher education. Higher Education Policy and Management, 24:53–73.

Thompson, D.R., Kirkman, S., Watson, R., & Stewart, S. 2005. Improving research supervision in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 25(4):283-290.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.011

Unwin, T. 2007. Reflections on supervising distance-based PhD students. http://www.gg.rhul.ac.uk/ict4d/distance-based PhDs.pdf.

Van Laren, L., Pithouse-Morgan, K., Chisanga, T., Harrison, L., Meyiwa, T., Muthukrishna, N. & Naicker, I. 2014. 'Walking our talk': Exploring supervision of postgraduate self-study research through methaphor drawing. South African Journal of Higher Education, 28(2):639-659.

Van Vuuren, L. 2013. Strategieë om die studieleiding van nagraadse studente in die skool vir verpleegkunde aan die Universiteit van die Vrystaat te bevorder. Thesis for Magister Societatis Scientiae (Nursing) degree. July.

Wang, T. & Li, L.Y. 2011, “Tell me what to do” vs “guide me through it’: feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2):101–188.

Watts, J. H. 2010. Team supervision of the doctorate: managing roles, relationships and contradictions. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3):335-339.

doi: 10.1080/13562511003740908.

White, T., & Coetzee, E. 2014. Postgraduate supervision: E-mail as an alternative. Africa Education Review, 11(4):658-673. doi: 10.1080/18146627.2014.935010.

Winberg, S. 2014. Changing our ways of supervising part-time postgraduates using an online supervision framework. http://www.iced2014.se/proceedings/1090_Winberg.pdf

Wisker, G. 2005. The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wolff, L. 2010. Learning through writing: reconceptualising the research supervision process. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(1):229–237.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14804/3-1-55

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Trends in Nursing


ISSN 2313-8467 (on-line)      Creative Commons License - CC BY 4.0


Powered by OJS and hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2014.


Disclaimer:

This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.

SUNJournals Help